This Theory of Change document serves as a guide for implementing a coordinated campaign to build public support and pressure Congress to enact fair, enforceable laws that improve government accountability. The Theory of Change provides a strategic, narrative explanation of how and why change is expected to happen, outlining the pathway from the current problem to the desired impact. It includes key assumptions, risks, and contextual factors, and is used to justify the strategy—explaining why mass mobilization, economic pressure, and public sentiment can influence policymakers when traditional mechanisms have failed. The Logic Model complements this by breaking down the campaign into actionable components: inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and long-term impacts. This implementation framework ensures that every step— from pledges and petitions to boycotts and investigations—builds on public will and measurable data to drive systemic change. Together, they provide a structured, evidence-informed roadmap from citizen engagement to legislative and institutional change.
Phase 1
1. Establish support via pledges and petitions
2. Refine widely supported demands
3. Boycott to pressure business
4. Business to pressure Congress
5. New widely-acceptable laws enacted
6. Improved federal governance
Phase 2
1. Boycott to pressure business
2. Business to pressure States & Congress
3. Investigations to promote accountability
4. Improved accountability & governance
Phase 3
1. Boycott to pressure business
2. Business to pressure Congress
3. Address critical structural-governance issues (rather than hot-button or values based issues)
4. Vital agencies and infrastructure stabilized to baseline functionality or upgraded to peak utility
Prioritized Principles
P1: Prohibit voter removal and purging. Voting must be easily accessible by all citizens.
P2: Develop the broadest possible set of widely acceptable demands in order to gain the support of over 50% of the population and limit the ability to discredit the protest’s goals and methods. Demands must focus on ensuring choice by the people and the behavior of federal officials.
P3: Investigations shall be designed to ensure the existing balance of political power is not altered. Corruption must be eliminated without regard to party affiliation.
P4: Restrict financial influence in the electoral process from wealthy donors and organizations. Ensure rule by the people through the unmanipulated selection of federal representatives. Ensure our nation's values are defined by the people. Prohibit self-enrichment mechanisms used by politicians and political operatives. Serving the public, and receiving a livable salary, must be the sole motivation for those seeking office. The same standard must apply to political staff and consultants.
P5: Codify all substantive rules and norms into law, with enforceable consequences.
We have a 'social compact' with our government in which we agree, as citizens, to obey laws, pay taxes, and cooperate as consumers. In return, the government promises to protect our rights, maintain security and order, uphold justice and the rule of law, provide representation and participation, and deliver public goods and services. We must demand that these promises be kept.
We have a responsibility to offer a plausible solution to our current troubles. We must live with the understanding that there is an answer to every problem and a solution to every question - if we are willing to apply our talents and imagination. If we never take on the responsibility - or the burden - of offering solutions rooted in our perspectives and life experiences, we become complicit in the very problems we now face.
Prioritized External Factors
E6: Historical frequency of everyday freedoms lost under authoritarian governments:
Actions by the current administration show a real desire to move toward an authoritarian style of government. How will that affect non-political, everyday life? Historically, many authoritarian systems did not remove daily routines entirely, but they often changed how predictable, fair, and autonomous everyday systems were. The losses usually appear in administrative control, favoritism, unpredictability of law, reduced choice, and dependence on state approval rather than explicit political repression.
1. Loss of Property Security (Homes, Businesses, Wealth)
Historical Frequency: 70-85%
Population Affected: Majority
Current Administration Similarities: Behavior and policy signals indicate this enjoyment/access is at-risk
Business owners risk losing licenses or contracts
The wealthy may be pressured to support regime
Poor citizens can lose housing protections
Government or political actors can seize property, revoke licenses, or force sales with weak legal recourse.
7. Reduced Media, Internet, and Information Diversity
Historical Frequency: 90-100%
Population Affected: All
Current Administration Similarities: Behavior and policy signals indicate this enjoyment/access is at-risk
Less variety in news sources
Cultural content becomes more uniform
Social media platforms pressured to acquiesce to the regime's agenda
Information ecosystems narrow as media outlets self-censor or come under state influence.